ReposLens vs dep-cruiser: Automated Enforcement vs Dependency Graphs

Updated March 2026

dep-cruiser is an excellent open-source tool. It analyzes dependencies in your JavaScript/TypeScript projects, generates graphs in SVG or DOT format, and can validate dependency rules through a configuration file. If you work in JS/TS, there's a good chance you've already encountered it.

The question isn't which one is "better" — it's which one solves your problem. dep-cruiser is a one-shot CLI tool. ReposLens is a continuous enforcement platform. The difference is fundamental.

dep-cruiser: the Swiss Army knife of dependency graphs

dep-cruiser scans your project and generates a file-level dependency graph. It supports CommonJS, ES modules, TypeScript, and can export to SVG, DOT, HTML, JSON, or text. Its configuration file (.dependency-cruiser.js) lets you define rules — for example, forbidding imports from src/api to src/ui.

Strengths: free, open-source, fast, excellent for JS/TS projects. You can integrate it into your CI pipeline by adding a command to your GitHub Actions workflow.

Limitations: JS/TS only. No interactive graph (static SVG). No health score. No historical tracking. CI integration is manual — you have to write the workflow yourself. And graphs of large projects quickly become unreadable.

ReposLens: continuous enforcement

ReposLens starts from the same need — understanding dependencies — but goes further. It connects to GitHub as an official app, scans your repo, and generates an interactive architecture map (zoom, click on modules, filters). But the real difference is what happens after the first scan.

ReposLens runs automatically on every Pull Request. You define rules in YAML (no circular dependencies, max coupling, layer enforcement), and the PR gets a Pass or Fail status check. No need to configure a CI workflow — it's native.

It also supports drift tracking over time: you see how your architecture evolves commit by commit, with a health score that goes up or down.

The fundamental difference

dep-cruiser tells you "here's the state of your dependencies right now." ReposLens tells you "here's the state, and I'll block any PR that degrades it." One is a diagnostic, the other is a policy. Both have value — but they don't solve the same problem.

Detailed comparison

Feature	ReposLens	dep-cruiser
Type of tool	SaaS (hosted)	CLI (local)
Setup time	60 seconds	5-15 min (npm + config)
Dependency graph visualization
Interactive graph (zoom, click, filter)
Circular dependency detection
Custom architecture rules	YAML rules	.dependency-cruiser.js
PR integration (Pass/Fail)
Continuous enforcement
Health score
Drift detection over time
Module coupling metrics
Works without local install
Output formats	Web app + Share link	SVG, DOT, HTML, JSON
Language support	JS/TS, Python, Go, Java +	JS/TS only
No code storage (GDPR)
Pricing	Free + $190/yr	Free (OSS)

Choose dep-cruiser if...

•You work exclusively in JavaScript/TypeScript
•You want a free, open-source tool you fully control
•You're comfortable configuring CI workflows manually
•You need a file-level dependency graph (not module-level)
•You want to export to SVG/DOT for documentation

Choose ReposLens if...

•You want automated enforcement on every PR, without configuring CI
•Your project uses multiple languages (not just JS/TS)
•You need an explorable interactive graph (not a static SVG)
•You want to track your architecture's evolution over time
•You prefer a ready-to-use SaaS over a tool to configure and maintain

Using both together

dep-cruiser excels at file-level analysis and graph export for documentation. ReposLens excels at continuous enforcement and architecture tracking. A pragmatic workflow: dep-cruiser locally to explore specific file dependencies, ReposLens in CI to block PRs that degrade the overall architecture.

Move from diagnosis to enforcement

You already know your architecture problems. ReposLens prevents them from coming back. Try it free in 60 seconds.

Scan my repo